Discussion with Historian Michal Šmigeľ after the Screening of Putin is Skiing

Report from the Discussion: Politkovskaya, Russian Authoritarianism, and Theatre as Civic Testimony

After another reprise of the performance, we organized a discussion that once again provided a comprehensive view of the play’s origin, historical context, and current geopolitical developments. The conversation confirmed that the themes addressed by the theatrical adaptation remain painfully relevant even sixteen years after its creation.

The Play’s Purpose and Origins

The creators presented the performance as a clear warning against Putin’s regime and the violation of human rights, particularly in Russia and Chechnya. The play was born out of conviction and carefully verified sources — primarily the reports of Anna Politkovskaya. Her texts in Novaya Gazeta form the backbone of the entire project.

Anna Politkovskaya and the Importance of Independent Journalism

The discussion reminded attendees of who is responsible for providing an authentic picture of Chechnya and Russian repressive practices. Politkovskaya, like other investigative journalists, paid for her work with persecution and ultimately her life. The speakers emphasized that independent media remain a crucial tool in uncovering the truth, with references made to the work of Anna Politkovskaya, Petra Procházková, and others.

Historical and Political Context: Chechnya, Putin, and the Soviet Legacy

Participants gained a detailed overview of both Chechen wars, their brutality, and political consequences. The second war became a catalyst for Putin’s rise to power — linked to nationalism, centralization of control, and the gradual erosion of freedoms.
The discussion also highlighted the broader geopolitical landscape: the connection between the current Russian regime and the Soviet security services, and its efforts to reassert influence in Belarus, Central Asia, Georgia, and Ukraine.

Ukraine: Democracy vs. Totalitarianism

The discussion framed Russia’s invasion of Ukraine as a clash between a totalitarian power and a country striving to build democratic institutions. References were made to Maidan, student protests, and the historical role of young people in societal change. The speakers highlighted the importance of civic courage — from November 17, 1989, to the present day.

Terrorism and Tragedies: Dubrovka and Beslan

A large part of the discussion focused on tragic events in Russia that remain unresolved. Participants recalled the Dubrovka theater attack, where the use of paralyzing gas claimed the lives of dozens of hostages. Similarly, Beslan — a massive trauma where hundreds died and families of victims were denied independent investigations.
It was noted that many indications pointed to security service involvement, yet investigations ended without clear results and public debate was gradually silenced.

Repression and Silencing of Dissenting Voices

The speakers pointed out systematic violence against journalists, activists, and opposition members. Murders, arrests, and constant intimidation led to the gradual disappearance of civic initiatives and memorial websites dedicated to victims. In Russia, not only the opposition but also collective memory is being erased.

Theatrical Poetics: Humor, Grotesque, and Symbols

The discussion also touched on the artistic form of the performance. The creators use dark humor and grotesque elements to make difficult topics accessible to the audience and help them endure the harsh realities.
The set design is based on a mobile military tent, allowing performances in various public spaces. The symbolism of Matryoshka dolls left a strong impression — a metaphor for layers of Russian imperialism and the “birth” of Putin from Stalinist and Leninist traditions.

Audience Reactions and Security Experiences

The discussion openly addressed unpleasant reactions — from insults on social media to an incident in Poland involving suspicious audience members. Occasional security presence was described as a practical and positive measure. Audiences often ask about the authenticity of the materials and the creators’ experiences, who emphasize that they rely on publicly available, verifiable facts.

Guest Speaker: Prof. Šmigeľ

The discussion was enriched by a guest with a personal connection to the post-Soviet space. Born in the USSR and academically focused on Russian history, he pointed out that “facts hurt,” but they are essential for understanding the present.

Challenges for Europe and the Need for Independent Media

The conclusion of the discussion emphasized that Europe often underestimates the threats coming from Russia. There was a call to monitor and support independent media and reporters delivering information directly from the field. Participants were advised to follow outlets such as Deník N and other verified sources.